Insights & Publications
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
© 2024 Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Circuit Court Adopts Narrow Interpretation of Anti-Retaliation Provision of Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Rules
19 July 2013
On July 17, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a groundbreaking and pro-defense ruling on the scope and applicability of the whistleblower protection rules enacted by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”). In
Asadi v. G.E. Energy (USA)
, LLC, No. 12-20522, 2013 WL 3742492 (5th Cir. July 17, 2013), the Fifth Circuit held that the “plain language” of Dodd-Frank’s whistleblower-protection provision applies only to individuals who report information relating to a violation of the securities laws to the SEC.
Notably, the Fifth Circuit affirmatively rejected the SEC’s final rule interpreting Dodd–Frank’s whistleblower-protection provision, noting that the agency’s “expansive interpretation” of the term “whistleblower” was not supported by the plain language of the statute.
In narrowly construing Dodd-Frank’s anti-retaliation provision, the Fifth Circuit took a firm and decidedly pro-employer stance on a statutory interpretation question that has vexed both courts and litigants since passage of the Dodd-Frank Act. Nevertheless, it remains to be seen how other courts will view the Asadi decision and whether they will follow the court’s analysis of the statutory construction issues.
Whistleblower Investigations and Litigation
Mary Beth Hogan
Jonathan R. Tuttle
UK Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement
Debevoise Login (2)
Debevoise Women's Review