Insights & Publications
Diversity & Inclusion
© 2020 Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
D.C. Circuit Court Affirms
on Narrower Grounds
29 May 2015
View Client Update
The Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirms the District Court’s holding that 1% U.S. federal excise tax does not apply to a retrocession contract between two foreign reinsurers.
The D.C. Circuit’s ruling is on narrower grounds than the District Court’s: unlike the District Court, the D.C. Circuit indicates that U.S.-to-foreign retrocessions are subject to the excise tax.
Absent further review by the full D.C. Circuit in an
proceeding or by the United States Supreme Court or a case arising in another Circuit Court, the decision appears to resolve favorably for taxpayers the question of whether the excise tax can be applied on a “cascading” basis to an entirely foreign-to-foreign reinsurance or retrocession transaction.
Peter A. Furci
Seth L. Rosen
Peter F.G. Schuur
UK Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement
Debevoise Women's Review