Insights & Publications
© 2018 Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
English High Court Confirms Parties May Contract Out Of Extending Time for Concurrent Delay
5 October 2017
View Client Update
A particularly contentious area of construction law is which party to a contract bears responsibility for the time and cost consequences of concurrent delay – i.e., where both the owner and contractor have caused delay to completion at the same time.
Different jurisdictions take different approaches to concurrent delay. The English law position is that the contractor is awarded an extension of time, but not prolongation costs. Other jurisdictions allow time and costs to be apportioned between the owner and contractor.
The recent case of
North Midland v Cyden
has confirmed that parties can avoid uncertainty by agreeing that the contractor will bear the risk of concurrent delay.
Arbitration & International Disputes
Putting Privilege Back into UK Investigations: the ENRC Appeal
Tactics and procedures used in international arbitration to promote efficiency
Experiencias y Retos del Ecuador en el Arbitraje de Inversión y Comercial
FCPA Update August 2018
UK Law Commission Proposes Reforms to Suspicious Activity Reports for Money Laundering
UK Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement
Debevoise Women's Review